Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Monday, January 19, 2009
Tropic Thunder - A Review
Friday evenings come with difficult choices in our household. The two most important happen to be (1) What are we going to eat? and (2) What are we going to watch? For two people as different as we there is rarely an obvious choice for either. We review the choices, talk about them, and review again. Until recently, the outcome has often been pizza and some movie we both like but have seen 10 million times.
But Joseph - I give him the credit for this change - has recently made the decision that he would like to experiment with some cooking. We have therefore moved away from Papa Murphy's and towards new and exciting meals. This past weekend, we enjoyed fajitas.
As for what we watch we have been better about choosing movies. Since we don't rent and often purchase, we must ensure that the movies are ones that one or both of us will watch again. Firewall? Poor purchase. The Dark Knight? Over and over and over again.
This weekend, we both decided to go for a recently well-acclaimed movie in Tropic Thunder. A few friends recommended it. "You'll like the line 'Don't go full 'tard' Ashley remarked to us." And so, we purchased it at Costco and let roll the tape. Well, actually, the disc, but who's counting?
The movie, rated R, commences with a few 'over the top' trailers starring the likes of Downey Jr's, Black's, and Stiller's characters. Three entirely different Hollywood stars who, as luck would have it, are going to star together in the film Tropic Thunder. The movie - based on a book of the same name - is a Vietnam War film akin to Platoon and replete with ridiculous gore and lengthy explosions.
When the actors on the film prove to be a bunch of egotistical prima donnas, the director along with the special effects guy and the author of the book, Tropic Thunder decide to plop the actors - unbeknownst to them - into the wilds of Vietnam where they - the actors - happen to encounter a real threat in the persons of heroin dealers.
Along the way, the movie takes any number of pot shots at Hollywood with its premature explosions, commentary on acting as a mentally handicapped person, and unnecessary sequels. Not to mention the greed and insensitivity of the likes of Tom Cruise as Les Grossman, a part that has him nominated for a Golden Globe Best Supporting Actor.
In my eyes, the movie was better than average but by no means great. Unlike the Scary Movie franchise and others of that sort, this movie attempts a drier humor with more subtlety. And that works, at times. But at others, it feels like it's too subtle for those who wouldn't describe themselves as rabid movie watchers. It just tries too hard.
If I'm being honest, that's how I feel about Ben Stiller on the whole. He's a 'funny man' who just tries too hard to be funny. It takes too much effort for him and thus he breaks that contract of suspended disbelief between the character and the audience. I suppose manic for me just isn't funny.
Downey Jr and Black are funnier in their characters, to be certain. But even they try too hard. And that's most likely because they were following the direction of Ben Stiller himself.
A final note, this movie reminds me of the movie Mars Attacks that proved to be a box office flop. Replete with well known actors, the movie was one big inside joke. Though Tropic Thunder cannot necessarily be called an inside joke per se, it still went a bit over my head.
Labels:
Movies,
Review,
Tropic Thunder
Monday, January 5, 2009
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - A Review
I ain't no high-falutin' movie critic. I can't tell ya who deserves an Oscar, though I could probably tag the Razzie recipients. I just go see movies. Not often, mind you. It's too expensive. Eight bucks for this most recent movie I went to see. And that was a matinee price. As for the food, don't get me started. It's a bigger rip-off than the ballpark. But people still pay. That's why the only thing I go to see any more are those big action packed flicks with light sabers and crashing helicopters and exploding worlds and the Joker.
But I'm not here to rail against the movies. They do what they do. And I do what I do. And we're all copasetic in the end. Just don't buy the food...
Right, Ben Button. Why did I see this movie? Because there was nothing else playing and it was a movie day for us. The first we'd seen in some time. Since The Dark Knight for me. I think Joseph had seen Hancock.
So, we play eenie meenie miney mo between Ben Button and Marley & Me. Why Marley & Me? The dog. Schmaltzy. Lovey dovey. Not my thing. But the dog swayed me to consider it. Well, Ben caught the tiger by the toe.
Previews. Nothing terribly exciting. Nothing memorable even. Which reminds me. Star Trek's coming this year. So's The Half Blood Prince. No, they have nothing to do with Benjamin Button. Yes, I'm getting to it. Oh, hold your horses...
First impression of this curious case? Forrest Gump 14 years later. Except without the racist first name. And the chocolates. And Sally Field. But there's a boat. And a woman who plays the interweaving love interest. STOP!
This is no ordinary woman, mind you. She was the first actress to win an Oscar playing an actress who had won an Oscar. Extra credit for her character's name and the movie in which she played her. Oh, but there's more. She played an over the top weirdo Russian doctor in some little-known movie associated with a skull. She defeated the Spanish Armada single-handedly from her elvish stronghold in Lothlorien. And she played Rosie in Parklands. No, I've never seen that movie before. Yes, I did look it up. Now will you let me get back to the review, please...
Right oh, a stellar leading lady already. Splendid. Match her up with the likes of Brad Pitt, and yes, I agree, there was quite a bit of chemistry. Always helpful. Academy award material? Well, if I had seen all the other movies this year, I'd be able to comment. Nonetheless, I think Brad did rather well.
But then... then... then - I can tell you're riddled with anticipation - there's the story itself. Again, similar to Forrest Gump but by no means a copy. This story challenges the illustrious and ever-forward-moving concept of time. Whether you grow from old to young or young to old, time continues to pass. A surprise to any of you? Well, I would certainly hope not. Except for that immortal in the corner. Oh, don't lose your head. Get out before I come over there with this sword.
But that time passes was not the point. That we should do with that time what we should, is. If you want to stay in your cubicle or in acting or in the shoe store, then stay there. And if you want to change your luck someday and do what you know you should do, then do that too. Nor wife nor husband nor child nor pet nor house nor job nor unknown fear should keep you from accomplishing what you need to accomplish in the time you have.
Would I recommend it? Yes, but not for $8.00 unless you're eager for cinematicity. Wait for the DVDs to flood the nearest Blockbuster and Best Buy and Office Max and random weird corner store. And then rent it on Netflix because it's really not a movie you must own to see over and over. Unless you love Brad Pitt. Or Rosie in Parklands. Or movies directed by David Fincher.
Overall, I give it a B. Kept my interest. Played with time. Taught me a lesson. And sent me on my way.
But I'm not here to rail against the movies. They do what they do. And I do what I do. And we're all copasetic in the end. Just don't buy the food...
Right, Ben Button. Why did I see this movie? Because there was nothing else playing and it was a movie day for us. The first we'd seen in some time. Since The Dark Knight for me. I think Joseph had seen Hancock.
So, we play eenie meenie miney mo between Ben Button and Marley & Me. Why Marley & Me? The dog. Schmaltzy. Lovey dovey. Not my thing. But the dog swayed me to consider it. Well, Ben caught the tiger by the toe.
Previews. Nothing terribly exciting. Nothing memorable even. Which reminds me. Star Trek's coming this year. So's The Half Blood Prince. No, they have nothing to do with Benjamin Button. Yes, I'm getting to it. Oh, hold your horses...
First impression of this curious case? Forrest Gump 14 years later. Except without the racist first name. And the chocolates. And Sally Field. But there's a boat. And a woman who plays the interweaving love interest. STOP!
This is no ordinary woman, mind you. She was the first actress to win an Oscar playing an actress who had won an Oscar. Extra credit for her character's name and the movie in which she played her. Oh, but there's more. She played an over the top weirdo Russian doctor in some little-known movie associated with a skull. She defeated the Spanish Armada single-handedly from her elvish stronghold in Lothlorien. And she played Rosie in Parklands. No, I've never seen that movie before. Yes, I did look it up. Now will you let me get back to the review, please...
Right oh, a stellar leading lady already. Splendid. Match her up with the likes of Brad Pitt, and yes, I agree, there was quite a bit of chemistry. Always helpful. Academy award material? Well, if I had seen all the other movies this year, I'd be able to comment. Nonetheless, I think Brad did rather well.
But then... then... then - I can tell you're riddled with anticipation - there's the story itself. Again, similar to Forrest Gump but by no means a copy. This story challenges the illustrious and ever-forward-moving concept of time. Whether you grow from old to young or young to old, time continues to pass. A surprise to any of you? Well, I would certainly hope not. Except for that immortal in the corner. Oh, don't lose your head. Get out before I come over there with this sword.
But that time passes was not the point. That we should do with that time what we should, is. If you want to stay in your cubicle or in acting or in the shoe store, then stay there. And if you want to change your luck someday and do what you know you should do, then do that too. Nor wife nor husband nor child nor pet nor house nor job nor unknown fear should keep you from accomplishing what you need to accomplish in the time you have.
Would I recommend it? Yes, but not for $8.00 unless you're eager for cinematicity. Wait for the DVDs to flood the nearest Blockbuster and Best Buy and Office Max and random weird corner store. And then rent it on Netflix because it's really not a movie you must own to see over and over. Unless you love Brad Pitt. Or Rosie in Parklands. Or movies directed by David Fincher.
Overall, I give it a B. Kept my interest. Played with time. Taught me a lesson. And sent me on my way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)